MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bi-level multi-source learning for heterogeneous block-wise missing data

2013· review· en· W2028633780 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Shuo Xiang, Lei Yuan, Wei Fan, Yalin Wang, Paul M. Thompson, Jieping Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. National Library of MedicineNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGenentechNational Institutes of HealthServierTakeda Pharmaceutical CompanyBayer HealthCareAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationPfizerAlzheimer's Drug Discovery FoundationMerckAmorfix Life SciencesEli Lilly and CompanyNational Institute on AgingAlzheimer's AssociationGE HealthcareBioClinicaAbbott LaboratoriesDana FoundationRocheFoundation for the National Institutes of Health
KeywordsMissing dataComputer sciencePruningBlock (permutation group theory)Artificial intelligenceData typeFeature (linguistics)Data miningMachine learningFeature selectionNeuroimagingData modelingAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativePattern recognition (psychology)Alzheimer's diseaseDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.593
GPT teacher head0.491
Teacher spread0.103 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations91
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImageSame topicStatistical Methods and InferenceFrench-language works237,207