MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028634978 · doi:10.1093/litthe/frm029

Blake, Nation and Empire. Edited by David Worrall and Steve Clark.

2007· article· en· W2028634978 on OpenAlexaff
Malcolm Lowe

Bibliographic record

VenueLiterature and Theology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMoravian Church and William Blake
Canadian institutionsMcMaster Divinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe ImaginaryMythologyPoetryEmpirePoliticsNationalismArt historyFutures contractClassicsArtHistoryLiteraturePhilosophyAncient historyLawPsychoanalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

William blake is not the only poet who has cast Jerusalem as a locus of prophetic vision; but where Amy Carmichael saw servants with faces set ‘toward Jerusalem/Let us not hinder them’, Blake relocated the city itself. His poem ‘Jerusalem’ (or ‘And did those feet,’ from the preface to Milton) combines ancient mythic time with a projected utopian future, built of biblical components. This sense of juxtaposition propels the Introduction and many of the chapters of Worrall and Clark's new volume, their third cooperative venture on Blake. For Blake, living at the edge of a century of pax britannica and maintaining an uneasy relationship with the growing empire and its Christian underpinnings, what did it mean to build ‘Jerusalem, in England's green and pleasant Land’? The book's multiple theses are at times cumbersome [as, for example, when the editors tell us that Blake's work entails ‘an immediately accessible structure of futures past: it both draws on the antiquarian mythology crucial to the mid-eighteenth century formation of British nationalism and prefigures an imperial imaginary …’(p. 17)], but the contributors deliver what they promise, unveiling implicit political, psychological and theological aspects in Blake that had previously remained unread.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLiterature and TheologySame topicMoravian Church and William BlakeFrench-language works237,207