Activation of the A<sub>1</sub>adenosine receptor increases insulin-stimulated glucose transport in isolated rat soleus muscle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR) has been suggested to participate in insulin- and contraction-stimulated glucose transport in skeletal muscle, but the qualitative and quantitative nature of the effect are controversial. We sought to determine if A1AR is expressed in rat soleus muscle and then characterize its role in glucose transport in this muscle. A1AR mRNA and protein expression were determined by RT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively. To examine the role of adenosine in 3-O-methylglucose transport, isolated muscles were exposed to adenosine deaminase and alpha,beta-methylene adenosine diphosphate to remove endogenous adenosine and were left unstimulated (basal) or stimulated with insulin. To assess the functional participation of A1AR in 3-O-methylglucose transport, muscles were incubated with A1-selective agonist and (or) antagonist in the absence of endogenous adenosine and with or without insulin. A1AR mRNA was expressed in soleus muscle and A1AR was present at the plasma membrane. Removal of endogenous adenosine reduced glucose transport in response to 100 microU/mL insulin (approximately 50%). The A1-selective agonist, N6-cyclopentyladenosine, increased submaximal (100 microU/mL) insulin-stimulated glucose transport in a dose-dependent manner (0.001-1.0 micromol/L). This stimulatory effect was inhibited by the A1-selective receptor antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine in a concentration-dependent manner (0.001-1.0 micromol/L). However, neither activation nor inhibition of A1AR altered basal or maximal (10 mU/mL) insulin-stimulated glucose transport. Our results suggest that adenosine contributes approximately 50% to insulin-stimulated muscle glucose transport by activating the A1AR. This effect is limited to increasing insulin sensitivity, but not to either basal or maximal insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in rat soleus muscle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".