MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cardiovascular Risk Factors Determine Erectile and Arterial Function Response to Sildenafil

2006· article· en· W2028673628 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Hypertension · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineErectile dysfunctionSildenafilArterial stiffnessInternal medicinePulse wave velocityEndothelial dysfunctionCardiologyRisk factorRenal functionUrologyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction is related to endothelial function. Cardiovascular risk factors determine endothelial function. Sildenafil is effective in treatment of erectile dysfunction but shows variable results. This study investigated the relationship of cardiovascular risk factors to acute and chronic responses to sildenafil. METHODS: Cardiovascular risk factors and acute and chronic pulse wave responses to a single 50-mg dose of sildenafil were assessed in 45 patients with erectile dysfunction confirmed by low international index of erectile function (IIEF) score before and after chronic therapy with sildenafil. RESULTS: On recruitment all patients showed evidence of erectile dysfunction with an IIEF score of 5 points (1 to 20 points). Chronic sildenafil therapy resulted in an increase of IIEF score of 13 points (range -1 to +24 points) and 24 patients (53%) achieved an IIEF score>or=21 points. Improvement in erectile function in response to sildenafil (rn=0.79; P<.001) was dependent on initial erectile function (P=.002) and baseline apolipoprotein B (P=.01). Vascular responses to acute treatment with sildenafil were assessed using pulse wave analysis. Acute changes in stiffness index induced by sildenafil (rn=0.65; P<.001) were related to apolipoprotein A-1 (P=.006), B (P=.02), and lipoprotein(a) (P=.008) concentrations, whereas reflection index (rn=0.69; P<.001) was related to pulse pressure (P<.001), albumin-to-creatinine ratio (P=.007), and lipoprotein(a) (P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: The extent of acute and chronic effects of sildenafil on erectile function and pulse wave profiles is determined by metabolic cardiovascular risk factors. Improved cardiovascular risk factor control is likely to increase the efficacy of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor therapy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it