MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028680064 · doi:10.1139/v99-226

A 2D deuterium NMR study of molecular reorientation in (CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>E<sup>+</sup>X<sup>-</sup> onium salts

2000· article· en· W2028680064 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Andrew M. Wachner, Kenneth R. Jeffrey, Glenn H. Penner

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular Spectroscopy and Structure
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryDeuteriumOniumNMR spectra databaseDeuterium NMRCrystallographySpectral lineMoleculeRelaxation (psychology)Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyMethyl groupComputational chemistryStereochemistryIonGroup (periodic table)Atomic physicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two dimensional deuterium NMR measurements are reported for three different onium salts (CH3)3SeNO3-d3, (CH3)3TeI-d3, and (CH3)3SI-d9. In these molecular solids with the general structure (CH3)3E+X-, three methyl groups are attached to the E atom. There is the possibility of reorientation of the methyls about their C3 axes and reorientation of the whole tri-methyl group about the C'3 axis. From an analysis of the 2D NMR exchange spectra the angle between the E-C bonds and the rotation axis for trimethyl reorientation were determined. Exchange rates and spin lattice relaxation times are given for several temperatures, to show how the mixing times for the experiments were selected. The data presented for (CH3)3TeI-d3, demonstrate that 2D techniques are sensitive to motions on a time scale an order of magnitude slower than that accessible using 1D line shape techniques.Key words: deuterium NMR, molecular motion, onium salts, two dimensional spectra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicMolecular Spectroscopy and StructureFrench-language works237,207