MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028720818 · doi:10.4000/cal.133

Un cycle de politiques environnementales

2011· article· fr· W2028720818 on OpenAlex
Sébastien Velut, Alexandra Poignant

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers des Amériques latines · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Environment - Saskatchewan
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au début de leurs deux décennies de gouvernement, les partis de la Concertación avaient fait de l’environnement un champ privilégié d’action pour se distinguer de la négligence du gouvernement autoritaire et respecter les obligations internationales du Chili. Or le style de développement du Chili, qui repose sur l’exploitation des ressources naturelles, entraîne des modifications de l’environnement et les instruments mis en place, notamment les études d’impact environnemental, ne sont pas suffisants pour les prévenir. Ces études ont cependant permis d’installer des mécanismes de gestion mais restent en-dessous des attentes d’une partie de la société. La création du ministère de l’environne­ment permet de rationaliser en partie le dispositif et, surtout, d’afficher de bons indicateurs à l’international, sans nécessairement résoudre les principaux problèmes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.462
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it