MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W202875014

On-line tutorials in undergraduate mathematics

2012· article· en· W202875014 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Communications · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovations in Educational Methods
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationMeaning (existential)Raising (metalworking)HabitComputer scienceSubject (documents)Line (geometry)Work (physics)PedagogyPsychologyMathematicsWorld Wide WebEngineeringSocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper concerns a blended learning environment in introductory undergraduate mathematics, where web-based training is integrated with classroom instruction. Such an environment is believed to be conducive to students' individual learning preferences. This paper examines students' experiences and needs, and compares them to a model of the student assumed by the on-line tutoring systems. Based on particular case studies I argue that regular practice using the on-line tutoring system may change the students' personal meaning of the learning activity and consequently change students' attitude and work habit towards higher level of industriousness and perseverance in their study. However, web-based training is less influential in terms of other aspects such as raising students' interest in the subject and teaching them to think mathematically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.625

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.367
GPT teacher head0.537
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it