Functional annotation of the <i>Arabidopsis</i> P450 superfamily based on large-scale co-expression analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cytochrome P450 mono-oxygenases play prominent roles in a diverse set of metabolic pathways, but the function of most of these enzymes remains obscure. A bottleneck in the functional genomics of this superfamily constitutes hypothesis generation to identify potential substrates (or substrate classes) individual P450s may act on. We used publicly available large-scale expression data to perform co-expression analysis comparing the expression matrix of each P450 with those from more than 4000 selected genes across thousands of microarrays. Based on functional annotations of co-expressed genes from a diverse set of databases, co-expressed pathways were thus identified for each P450. Using this approach, most P450s with known functions were placed into their respective pathways, thereby proofing the concept. As examples, pathway mapping results identifying novel P450s potentially acting on flower-specific monoterpenes and root-specific triterpenes are described. Co-expression results for all Arabidopsis P450s will be presented as a web resource on the 'CYPedia' web pages (http://ibmp.u-strasbg.fr/CYPedia/).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".