A SERS-Active System Based on Silver Nanoparticles Tethered to a Deposited Silver Film
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of SERS-active nanostructures were produced by exposing a freshly deposited silver film (fabricated to be as free from roughness as practicable) to a solution containing a mixture of 1-decanethiol (m) and 1,9-nonanedithiol (d) of varying concentrations of m to d, then allowing colloidal silver nanoparticles to interact with the surface. Silver nanoparticles were found to bind exclusively to films which were prepared from solutions with a nonzero concentration of the dithiol implying that the nanoparticles were tethered to the silver surface by the dithiol with one of the thiolate groups bound to the nanoparticle and the other to the silver film. Intense SERS spectra were observed even from samples in which the m/d concentration ratio was so large that the adsorbed molecules in the vicinity of only approximately 8 +/- 3 nanoparticles were illuminated by the diffraction-limited focused laser beam. At such high dilution, the molecules (numbering at most approximately 330) residing in the SERS "hot spots" associated with the approximately 8 nanoparticles consisted primarily of m (although, of course, for each nanoparticle, at least one molecule in the hot spot had to be d to serve as the linker). This was corroborated by the SERS spectra. An analysis is presented, which accounts for the fact that as the concentration ratio of m/d increases, the SERS intensity associated with bands belonging to m first increases to a maximum then decreases. The nanoparticle-metal film system presented here is a simple embodiment of a more general range of SERS-active sensing platforms in which a molecular tether is used to create a SERS hot spot that (although nanosized) is large enough to accommodate analyte molecules that cannot themselves function as linkers, which are subsequently detected by SERS at the few-molecule level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".