Are Ectopic or Abnormal Membrane Hormone Receptors Frequently Present in Adrenal Cushing’s Syndrome?1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Twenty consecutive patients with adrenal Cushing's syndrome were studied with an in vivo protocol to determine the prevalence and diversity of the presence of ectopic or abnormal hormone receptors in their adrenal tissues. All six patients with bilateral ACTH-independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia were found to have one or two abnormal adrenal receptors, including those for gastric inhibitory polypeptide, vasopressin (V1-vasopressin), beta-adrenergic agonists, LH/human CG, or serotonin 5-HT4. The presence of abnormal hormone receptors was found to be less frequently present in unilateral adenomas or carcinomas (3 of 14). The identification of abnormal adrenal hormone receptors can allow new pharmacological therapies of hypercortisolism. We suggest that the clinical screening for the presence of abnormal hormone receptors should be conducted in patients with adrenal Cushing's syndrome and, more particularly, in those with ACTH-independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia, in the hope of offering medical therapy as an alternative to bilateral adrenalectomy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".