Occult pneumothoraces in critical care
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with an occult pneumothoraces (OPTXs) may be at risk of tension pneumothoraces (TPTXs) without drainage or pleural drainage complications if treated. METHODS: Adults with traumatic OPTXs and requiring positive-pressure ventilation (PPV) were randomized to pleural drainage or observation (one side only enrolled if bilateral). All subsequent care and method of pleural drainage was per attending physician discretion. The primary outcome was a composite of respiratory distress (RD) (need for urgent pleural drainage, acute/sustained increases in O2 requirements, ventilator dysynchrony, and/or charted respiratory events). RESULTS: Ninety severely injured patients (mean [SD], Injury Severity Score [ISS], 33 [11]) were studied at four centers: Calgary (55), Toronto (27), Quebec (6), and Sherbrooke (3). Forty were randomized to tube thoracostomy, and 50 were randomized to observation. The risk of RD was similar between the observation and tube thoracostomy groups (relative risk, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.27). There was no difference in mortality or intensive care unit (ICU), ventilator, or hospital days between groups. In those observed, 20% required subsequent pleural drainage (40% PTX progression, 60% pleural fluid, and 20% other). One observed patient (2%) undergoing PPV at enrollment had a TPTX, which was treated with urgent tube thoracostomy without sequelae. Drainage complications occurred in 15% of those randomized to drainage, while suboptimal tube thoracostomy position occurred in an additional 15%. There were three times (24% vs. 8%) more failures and more RDs (p = 0.01) among those observed with OPTXs requiring sustained PPV versus just for an operation, which increases threefold after a week in the ICU (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that OPTXs may be safely observed in hemodynamically stable patients undergoing PPV just for an operation, although one third of those requiring a week or more of ICU care received drainage, and TPTXs still occur. Complications of pleural drainage remain unacceptably high, and future work should attempt to delineate specific factors among those observed that warrant prophylactic drainage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level III.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".