MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028864177 · doi:10.1093/sf/sot019

Sustainable Failures: Environmental Policy and Democracy in a Petro-Dependent World By Sherry Cable Temple University Press. 2012. 242 pages. $29.95 paper

2013· article· en· W2028864177 on OpenAlex
Debra J. Davidson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Forces · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomic JusticePolitical scienceCorporationEngineeringLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this well-researched and accessible volume on our environmental predicament, Sherry Cable asks: To what extent do environmental policies acknowledge ecological principles and enact principles of fairness and justice? The book primarily focuses on the United States, although there is a chapter on international environmental policymaking as well. The book is rich in empirical detail, with numerous illustrative case studies and comprehensive inventories of the U.S. environmental policy regime. The book begins with a condensed history of modes of human existence and their relationship with the environment, and then goes into greater detail regarding our modern, petro-based industrial society. Employing Schnaiberg's Treadmill of Production Theory, Cable not surprisingly pays particular attention to the role of corporations and complicit states. The litany of environmental horrors associated with petro-dependent industrial societies is then described in detail, aided by Cable's particular expertise in environmental health. The U.S. basket of environmental policies is then inventoried and evaluated in great detail, on the basis of the criteria noted above. Not surprisingly, the U.S. environmental policy apparatus is found wanting, in a chapter identifying numerous examples of violation of ecological principles. This is followed by a chapter devoted to the means by which current policies reinforce inequities in the distribution of environmental ills, and marginalization of citizens in the policy process. Towards the end of the book, Cable narrows in on the most vexing of challenges, climate change, peak oil and overpopulation, followed by the presumed culprit, the transnational corporation and its captive state system. Finally, the book closes with a vision of an alternative future premised on localized social systems in which respect for ecological principles in economic processes is paramount.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it