MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028924663 · doi:10.1109/sarnof.2015.7324647

Real-time evacuating routing during earthquake using a sensor network in an indoor environment

2015· article· en· W2028924663 on OpenAlexaff
Jingya Liu, Roberto Rojas‐Cessa, Ziqian Dong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEvacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Canadian institutionsNew York Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceConfusionRouting (electronic design automation)Wireless sensor networkEvent (particle physics)Real-time computingBlocking (statistics)State (computer science)Computer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a framework for speeding the evacuation time of occupants in a building during an earthquake. The framework is based on the information collected from a sensor network, an algorithm to calculate evacuation routes, and dissemination of route information to occupants. The sensor network is used to determine the state of whether areas and spaces are transitable or blocked. State information is then used to calculate evacuation routes. We evaluate the performance of the proposed framework under the event of an earthquake by estimating the time in which an occupant is able to evacuate the building. Our results show that evacuation paths are sensitive to small blocking probabilities, which represent the intensity of earthquake damage of an indoor area in this paper. We also show that the information provided by a fully functional information network adopting the proposed framework simplifies the evacuation to the extent that an occupant experiences little or no confusion as to where to exit. In general, we see that an occupant may easily be routed to the exit to which evacuation may take the shortest time and that changes of evacuation routes may hardly occur. We show that the variations on evacuation times are small.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.726

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEvacuation and Crowd DynamicsFrench-language works237,207