Hypervalent, Low-Coordinate Phosphorus(III) Centers in Complexes of the Phosphadiazonium Cation with Chelate Ligands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trifluoromethylsulfonyloxy-(2,4,6-tri-tert-butylphenylimino)phosphine, Mes*NPOTf (Mes = 2,4,6-tri-tert-butylphenyl, OTf = trifluoromethanesulfonate, triflate) reacts quantitatively with the multifunctional ligands 2,2'-bipyridine (2,2'-BIPY), N,N,N',N'-tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA), 1,2-bis(diethylphosphino)ethane (DEPE), 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane (DIPHOS), and N,N,N',N' ',N' '-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA) to give the Lewis acid-base complexes [Mes*NP(2,2'-BIPY)][OTf], [Mes*NP(TMEDA)][OTf], [Mes*NP(DIPHOS)][OTf], [Mes*NP(DEPE)][OTf], and [Mes*NP(PMDETA)][OTf], respectively. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies indicate that the closest contact of the ligand donor atoms occurs at phosphorus in all cases, affecting significant displacement of the OTf anion. The resulting cations [Mes*NP(L)]+ are best described as complexes of a neutral chelating ligand on a phosphadiazonium Lewis acceptor, and highlight the potential for electron-rich centers to behave as Lewis acids despite the presence of a lone pair of electrons at the acceptor site. More importantly, the new complexes represent rare examples of systems containing hypervalent, low-coordinate phosphorus(III) centers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".