MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028946737 · doi:10.1117/12.921069

MeMBer filter for manoeuvring targets

2012· article· en· W2028946737 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersMcMaster UniversityEvelyn F. McKnight Brain Research Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceRecursion (computer science)Filter (signal processing)ImplementationBernoulli's principleJumpTracking (education)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceComputer visionProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper will introduce a new Multitarget Multi-Bernoulli (MeMBer) recursion for tracking targets traveling under multiple motion models. The proposed interacting multiple model MeMBer (IMM-MeMBer) filter uses Jump Markov Models (JMM) to extended the basic MeMBer recursion to allow for multiple motion models. This extension is implemented using both the SMC and GM based MeMBer approximations. The recursive prediction and update equations are presented for both implementations. Each multiple model implementation is validated against its respective standard MeMBer implementation as well as against each other. This validation is done using a simulated scenario containing multiple maneuvering targets. A variety of metrics are observed including target detection capability, estimate accuracy and model likelihood determination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it