MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028952882 · doi:10.1002/mop.27492

Rectangular ring‐shaped dielectric resonator antenna for dual and wideband frequency

2013· article· en· W2028952882 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWidebandDielectric resonator antennaAcousticsAntenna (radio)Dielectric resonatorRing (chemistry)Dual (grammatical number)Split-ring resonatorDielectricMaterials scienceResonatorElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringPhysicsEngineeringArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new modified planar dielectric resonator antenna (DRA) is presented and investigated. The proposed DRA is excited by a microstrip feed that is extended as a probe in the proximity of the DR. On the opposite side to the probe excitation printed narrow strips directly connected to the ground plane edge are used to improve the radiation characteristics of the antenna by keeping a unidirectional broadside radiation. In addition, the short circuit strips introduce a second frequency band. Thus, a dual‐band antenna is achieved. The measured bandwidths are about 73% (2.78–5.95 GHz) for the wideband DRA as well as 8% (2.4–2.6 GHz) and 56% (3.3–5.85 GHz) for the dual‐band DRA. The minimum and maximum gain enhancements of about 0.6 and 1.2 dB from 3.5 to 6 GHz are obtained. Parametric study and measurement results are presented and discussed. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 55:1077–1081, 2013; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com. DOI 10.1002/mop.27492

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.473
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it