MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A New form of Microfluidic Sample Delivery for High Throughput Biosensor Analysis

2011· article· en· W2028971655 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher Whalen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsSierra Wireless (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSample (material)MicrofluidicsFlexibility (engineering)ThroughputComputer scienceNanotechnologyMultiplexBiosensorProcess engineeringBiochemical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsMaterials scienceBioinformaticsWirelessChemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the biosensor industry continues to mature many of the big breakthroughs in analysis performance will not come from huge advances in detection, but from the tangential technologies. One of these technologies is sample delivery. It is now clearly understood that the way samples are presented to the sensing surface(s) significantly impacts the performance and applicability of analytical biosensors. There is also the ever present desire to simultaneously analyze as many samples as possible. A sample delivery system that provides high throughput, high performance, and flexibility, could dramatically change the use of analytical biosensors. This presentation will focus on a new form of microfluidic sample delivery called Hydrodynamic Isolation (HI). Through a combination of hydrodynamic focusing and location specific sample delivery and evacuation, HI can simultaneously deliver different sample solutions to each sensing location on any two-dimensional detection array. Even in an open array the different solution streams are completely independent, are delivered as very discrete volumes, and a single solution can be addressed to one or more sensor locations. HI eliminates the need for mechanical micro-valves close to the detection chamber, making it simple to build and multiplex. By enabling full flexibility in sample delivery across 2-D arrays, HI has the potential to greatly improve analysis throughput but it will also have a big impact on assay design and development times. The use of HI in an array based real-time label-free analysis platform will be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207