MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028976658 · doi:10.1002/mop.27546

A novel miniaturized UWB antenna with four band‐notches

2013· article· en· W2028976658 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWiMAXStanding wave ratioOmnidirectional antennaStub (electronics)MicrowaveDirectivityAntenna (radio)Electrical engineeringJ-pole antennaC bandCoaxial antennaEngineeringTelecommunicationsElectronic engineeringPhysicsMicrostrip antennaWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this article, an effective design method is presented to design a miniaturized UWB antenna with four band‐notches. By carefully integrating C‐shaped slots, L‐shaped open circuit stub, and T‐shaped parasitic strip onto the primitive miniaturized antenna, four band‐notches (VSWR > 2) could be achieved at 3.38–3.65 GHz, 4.95–6.05 GHz, 7.42–7.78 GHz, and 8.1–8.9 GHz to reject WiMAX, WLAN, X‐band satellite communication, and ITU 8 GHz band signals. Simulated and measured results show that this antenna could operate from 3.15–11.1 GHz (VSWR < 2), and maintain omnidirectional directivity patterns at H‐plane. Moreover, the proposed antenna has a very compact size of 18.6 × 22 × 1.5 mm 3 . © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 55:1202–1206, 2013; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com. DOI 10.1002/mop.27546

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.633

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it