MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029008526 · doi:10.1002/pssc.200881280

Near‐infrared inorganic/organic hybrid optical upconverter with an embedded mirror

2009· article· en· W2029008526 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Chen, Dayan Ban, Xiaodong Feng, Zheng‐Hong Lu, Saeed Fathololoumi, A. J. Spring Thorpe, H. C. Liu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural SciencesUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotocurrentOptoelectronicsMaterials sciencePhotodetectorOLEDDark currentLight-emitting diodeBiasingDiodeInfraredVisible spectrumTandemOptical powerOpticsVoltageNanotechnologyLaserElectrical engineeringLayer (electronics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report a hybrid organic‐inorganic optical upconverter with an embedded metal mirror. The device was fabricated through direct tandem integration of an organic light emitting diode (OLED) with an inorganic InGaAs/InP photodetector, converting 1.5 μm infrared light to visible light. It was found that the device with an embedded mirror exhibited a low turn‐on voltage (∼3.2 V) and an enhanced efficiency. The ratio of photocurrent‐induced with an input power density of 0.67 mW/mm2 versus dark‐current‐induced visible light was over 500 at a device bias of 6 V at room temperature. The results show that the embedded mirror at the inorganic‐organic interface plays a vital role in the performance enhancement of a hybrid upconverter. (© 2009 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physicsSame topicOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes ResearchFrench-language works237,207