MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029019497 · doi:10.2217/17455057.3.1.39

Clinical Considerations regarding Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy

2006· article· en· W2029019497 on OpenAlexaff
David R. McCready, Jaime Escallón

Bibliographic record

VenueWomen s Health · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBRCA gene mutations in cancer
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMastectomyBreast cancerProphylactic MastectomySurgeryDiseaseAdjuvantCancerOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The risk factors and clinical features for contralateral breast cancer are reviewed. Prevention is afforded by adjuvant systemic treatments but the largest risk reduction (95%) occurs with prophylactic mastectomy. Satisfaction with this procedure is high in selected individuals and studies but the potential complications should not be taken lightly. For those with a high risk of contralateral disease and a primary tumor with relatively good prognosis, it is quite reasonable to discuss and perform contralateral mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWomen s HealthSame topicBRCA gene mutations in cancerFrench-language works237,207