MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2029022961 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100000603

Scalp EEG in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Surgery

2000· review· en· W2029022961 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Mark Sadler, Richard Desbiens

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsHôpital de l'Enfant-JésusQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIctalTemporal lobeScalpEpilepsy surgeryElectroencephalographyEpilepsyMedicinePsychologyAnesthesiaNeuroscienceAudiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electroencephalography (EEG) with standard scalp and additional noninvasive electrodes plays a major role in the selection of patients for temporal lobe epilepsy surgery. Recent studies have provided data supporting the value of interictal and postictal EEG in assessing the site of ictal onset. Scalp ictal rhythms are morphologically complex but at least one pattern (a five cycles/second rhythm maximum at the sphenoidal or anterior temporal electrode) occurs in >50% of patients and has a high predictive value and interobserver reliability for temporal lobe originating seizures. Thorough interictal and ictal scalp EEG evaluation, in conjunction with modern neuroimaging, is sufficient for proceeding to surgery without invasive recordings in some patients. Further studies are required to define the scalp ictal characteristics of mesial vs. lateral temporal lobe epilepsy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicEpilepsy research and treatment→French-language works237,207→