MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029034216 · doi:10.1300/j016v25n02_01

Physical Activity Decision-Making in Older Adults

2001· article· en· W2029034216 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueActivities Adaptation & Aging · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicBehavioral Health and Interventions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyDispositionAffect (linguistics)PerceptionPhysical activityQualitative researchEveryday lifeGerontologySocial psychologyDevelopmental psychologyMedicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The study investigated whether or not self-perceptions of physical reality and motivational disposition and orientation affect personal decisions regarding exercise behavior in four hypothetical everyday-life situations. Twenty-four (14 women and 10 men) older (mean age 75 years) volunteer participants from Canada and Germany were interviewed. The responses were subjected to a qualitative content analysis. The data showed that all participants were physically active and perceived themselves as physically fit. However, their level of involvement varied immensely. The participants' self-evaluation of the level of physical fitness corresponded with their observations of the energy requirements for the activities in which they participated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.776

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it