MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029045462 · doi:10.1063/1.2917535

Does drop size affect the mechanism of viscoelastic drop breakup?

2008· article· en· W2029045462 on OpenAlexaff
Huaping Li, Uttandaraman Sundararaj

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreakupDrop (telecommunication)MechanicsPhysicsVorticityShear flowNewtonian fluidClassical mechanicsVortex

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We studied the breakup of viscoelastic drops in Newtonian liquid matrices undergoing simple shear flow. The coexistence of different breakup modes was observed. The drop size determines, to a great extent, the type of drop breakup mechanism and the critical point when the mechanism changes. Small drops break along the vorticity direction, which is the direction perpendicular to the flow direction and the velocity gradient direction, whereas large drops break in the flow direction. The change in mechanism abruptly occurs as the drop size reduces. There is a big jump in the critical shear rate when the mechanism changes from breakup in the flow direction to breakup in the vorticity direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.435
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207