La contemplation du cadavre dans la méditation bouddhiste et les arts visuels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le cadavre possède un pouvoir d’évocation exceptionnel sur lequel s’appuient deux pratiques qui semblent éloignées à bien des égards : la contemplation de charnier, qui utilise les restes humains comme support visuel à la méditation sur la mort, et les productions contemporaines en arts visuels, qui manipulent ces restes comme matériau artistique. Ces deux pratiques remettent en question la frontière entre réfléchir sur la mort et réfléchir avec la mort, en développant des stratégies qui visent un double objectif : saisir l’essence de la mort et ainsi conjurer l’angoisse qu’elle génère. Dans cet article, notre objectif est de mettre en lumière des indicateurs révélant la place qu’occupent dans ces stratégies les trois gestes de la réduction phénoménologique selon Husserl : la conversion réflexive, la variation imaginaire et l’ épochè transcendantale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".