MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CHROMOSOME NUMBERS AND MEIOSIS IN CERTAIN SALICES

2010· article· en· W2029080306 on OpenAlexaff
ARTUR HÅKANSSON

Bibliographic record

VenueHereditas · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotanical Research and Chemistry
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Genetics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCitationGeneticsChromosomeMeiosisLibrary scienceComputer scienceGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

constriction (subterminal centromere).Most diploid species have 4 L', 4 T and 2 S, the idiogram being 4 L' +28 M +4 T+2 S.Thanks to the activity of British cytologists the chromosome numbers of all native species (20) in the new Flora of the British Isles are known.MARKLUND has determined the chromosome numbers of the majority of Scandinavian species, his numbers being published in the Scandinavian Flora of HOLMBERG and in chromosome lists of LOVE and LOVE.Our knowledge of Central European species is fragmentary where species lacking a wide distribution are concerned.Japanese investigators have recorded a number of Salices from Eastern Asia.The numbers of many Salix species are unknown: most of them are in subtropical regions or other regions where cytological investigations do not seem to occur.The highest degree of polyploidy that was found is octoploid (S. glauca, S. borealis) and decaploid (S. myrsinites).Intraspecific polyploidy is known in Salix.The first case reported was S. aurita, which is diploid and tetraploid.Later diploid and tetraploid cytotypes have been found in S. lapponum and in S. caprea, and diploid and decaploid cytotypes in S. myrsinites.In S. caprea MARKLUND found a triploid; a similar shrub was found by WILKINSON in the usually diploid S. daphnoides.WILKINSON stresses that there are no taxonomical differences between the different cytotypes (see also Flora of the British Isles).Surely in Salix we have true intraspecific polyploidy!My own contributions to Salix cytology are based on the experimental material of Professor HERIBERT NILSSON (HAKANSSON, 1929, 1933, 1938, 1944).The good chromosome pairing at first metaphase and the regular first anaphase of simple and complex hybrids with an even number of genomes were a striking fact.This general regularity of meiosis did not, however, exclude the formation of diploid or polyploid pollen grainsin S. viminalisXS.caprea in a frequency of about 1 % of functioning d'-gametes, to judge by the number of triploids in the progeny.In the crosses shrubs with unexpected and striking exterior, which NILSSON called »extravagant forms», had occasionally appeared.They were interpreted by him in a purely Mendelian way as extreme recombinations.However, several extravagant forms were polyploid and thus genome mutations rather than recombinations; instances are the triploid gigantea and [alciiolia types, the tetraploid neocinerea, and the pentaploid laurina, all of them having appeared in the F. generation of S. viminalisXS.caprea.Another experimental polyploid was the extravagant form amerinoides from the cross S. (viminalisXS.repens) X S. repens; it was tetraploid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueHereditasSame topicBotanical Research and ChemistryFrench-language works237,207