MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029097407 · doi:10.1063/1.1691471

Commissioning the TRIUMF/ISAC electron cyclotron resonance ion source for radioactive ion beams

2004· article· en· W2029097407 on OpenAlex
K. Jayamanna, D. Yuan, M. Olivo, R. Baartman, G. Dutto, M. McDonald, A.K. Mitra, P. W. Schmor, G. Stanford

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersTRIUMF
KeywordsIon sourceProtonMaterials scienceRadiochemistryElectromagnetic shieldingCyclotronBeam (structure)Isotope separationIonElectron cyclotron resonanceIon beamIsotopeNuclear physicsNuclear engineeringElectronPhysicsChemistryOpticsPlasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A radiation hard 2.45 GHz ECR source has been installed in the ISAC target station. The ion source with its 8–60 kV extraction system is coupled to the radioactive isotope production target via a short transfer tube. The volatile radioactive isotopes produced by bombarding a target with a 500 MeV proton beam, are ionized and accelerated at the ECR source system. The source is reengineered to withstand a dose rate of 105 Gy/h from the activation of the target by the 500 MeV, 100 mA proton beam. The whole assembly is located beneath a 2 m thick steel shielding structure. Design aspect of the source and the initial results obtained during the commissioning at the ISAC terminal, as well as preliminary results obtained at the test stand are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.657
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it