MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029104161 · doi:10.1080/0703633042000261661

Ukraine and the European Union: a perennial neighbour?

2004· article· en· W2029104161 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of European Integration · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Politics and Security
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas University
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsEuropean unionPerennial plantPolitical scienceInternational tradeEconomicsEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As ten new states are integrated into a family of democratic European nations, Ukraine, the second largest post‐Soviet state, is dismayed with the lack of progress in its own movement toward EU membership. While Kiev clamours to join the EU for both security and economic reasons, the Ukrainian government shies away from real reform at home. The paper examines dilemmas of Ukraine's ‘European choice’, focusing on the history of EU‐Ukraine relations, Kiev's strategy, mass perceptions, and the reasons behind the EU's unwillingness to start pre‐accession negotiations with the country. It concludes that the key obstacles in the way of Ukraine's Euro‐Atlantic integration are of Ukraine's own making and have to be addressed domestically. Ukraine's application for EU membership will not be favourably received until the country proves itself a democracy and reaches a higher level of economic development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it