MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029114144 · doi:10.1080/17480930600720206

Modelling open pit dynamics using discrete simulation

2007· article· en· W2029114144 on OpenAlexaff
Hooman Askari-Nasab, Samuel Frimpong, J. Szymański

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mining Reclamation and Environment · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatistical physicsComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective in any mining operation is to exploit ore at the lowest possible cost with the prospect of maximizing profits. The planning of an open pit mine is an economic exercise, constrained by certain geological, operating, technological and local field factors. Heuristic methods, economic parametric analysis, operations research and genetic algorithms have been used to formulate periodic open pit planning problems. Open pit design, optimization and subsequent materials scheduling problems are governed by stochastic dynamic process. Thus, current algorithms are limited in their abilities to address problems arising from these random and dynamic field processes. The primary objective of this study is to use a discrete stochastic simulation to capture the random field processes associated with open pit design and materials scheduling. An open pit production simulator (OPPS), implemented in MATLAB, based on a modified elliptical frustum is used to model the geometry of open pit layout expansion. The simulator mimics the periodic expansion of the open pit layouts. The interaction of the open pit expansion model with the geological and economic block model returns the respective amount of ore, waste, stockpile materials, and the net present value of the venture. A case study of an iron ore deposit with 114 000 blocks was carried out to verify and validate the model. The optimized pit limit was designed using the Lerchs – Grossman algorithm. The best-case annual schedule, generated by the shells node in Whittle Four-X, yielded a net present value (NPV) of $414 million over a 21-year mine life at a discount rate of 10% per annum. The best scenario out of 5000 simulation iterations using OPPS resulted in an NPV of $422 million over the same time span. Further research, based on hybrid stochastic simulation in conjunction with reinforcement learning, can provide a powerful tool for addressing the random field and dynamic processes in long-term open pit planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Mining Reclamation and EnvironmentSame topicMining Techniques and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207