MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029115217 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.139902

Erratum: Direct Observation of Ferromagnetic Spin Polarization in Gold Nanoparticles [Phys. Rev. Lett.<b>93</b>, 116801 (2004)]

2006· erratum· en· W2029115217 on OpenAlexaff
Yoshinori Yamamoto, Takahiro Miura, Teruo Teranishi, H. Hori, Minoru Suzuki, Naomi Kawamura, H. Miyagawa, Tetsuya Nakamura, Kyousuke Kobayashi

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2006
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFerromagnetismCondensed matter physicsPolarization (electrochemistry)Spin polarizationMaterials scienceSpin (aerodynamics)PhysicsQuantum mechanicsChemistryPhysical chemistryThermodynamicsElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

References [1,2] should have been included after Ref. [26], in which the observation of magnetism due to the charge transfer process from the gold substrate to the self-assembled monolayers of molecules has been reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicMolecular Junctions and NanostructuresFrench-language works237,207