Post-exercise hypotension and cardiovascular responses to moderate orthostatic stress in endurance-trained males
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that following an acute bout of exercise cardiovascular and cerebrovascular responses to lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) would be altered due to post-exercise hypotension (PEH). Ten healthy, male, endurance-trained athletes (mean age +/- SD = 29.6 +/- 5) were assessed for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular responses to LBNP following acute bouts of interval and continuous exercise. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output, total peripheral resistance, heart rate variability, and total cerebral oxygen index were determined during a baseline LBNP session. These indices were also determined during two other LBNP sessions: following an acute bout of interval exercise, and following an acute bout of continuous exercise. Compared with baseline, MAP was reduced after both exercise conditions, similar to values previously reported (10 mmHg; p < 0.05 vs. pre-exercise). Total peripheral resistance was significantly reduced following both exercise bouts, and heart rate was significantly increased post-exercise (rest: 59.6 +/- 11.2; interval: 77.8 +/- 12.8; continuous: 80.3 +/- 15.2 beats.min(-1)). Both cardiac output and stroke volume responses to LBNP following exercise were not altered when compared with baseline measurements. Tissue oxygenation during -40 mmHg (interval: 74.31% +/- 7.82% vs. continuous: 69.13% +/- 5.23%) was significantly lower than during normobaric pressure (interval: 77.14% +/- 1.30% vs. continuous: 74.41% +/- 0.94%). It appears from these observations that although young, endurance-trained males experience PEH following acute bouts of interval or continuous exercise, this hypotension does not alter the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular responses to a moderate orthostatic stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".