MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029149643 · doi:10.1088/0951-7715/19/7/007

Domain of analyticity of normalizing transformations

2006· article· en· W2029149643 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Saprykina

Bibliographic record

VenueNonlinearity · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular spectroscopy and chirality
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolydiscMathematicsHolomorphic functionSymplectic geometryPure mathematicsTransformation (genetics)Legendre transformationAnalytic functionMathematical analysisQuadratic equationHamiltonian systemDomain (mathematical analysis)Complex planeGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate questions of divergence or local convergence of (formal) normalizing transformations associated with the Birkhoff normal form (BNF) at the origin of a holomorphic Hamiltonian system. These questions are addressed for systems for which the BNF is a quadratic function , Λ := (λ 1 , ..., λ d ) being a non-resonant, either real or purely imaginary, vector. We prove that for a generic or one can define Hamiltonians satisfying the following properties: (i) H is real-analytic, holomorphic in the unit polydisc , and H is defined arbitrarily close to H Λ , (ii) the BNF of H equals H Λ and (iii) any symplectic normalizing transformation diverges, or given any 0 < ρ < 1 any normalizing transformation diverges outside the polydisc of radius ρ, and there is a real-analytic normalizing transformation (converging in a smaller domain).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNonlinearitySame topicMolecular spectroscopy and chiralityFrench-language works237,207