MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029220380 · doi:10.22630/eiogz.2013.103.34

Towarowe instrumenty pochodne w stabilizowaniu dochodów z produkcji rzepaku w warunkach rosnącego ryzyka cenowego

2013· article· pl· W2029220380 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZeszyty Naukowe SGGW - Ekonomika i Organizacja Gospodarki Żywnościowej · 2013
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinance, Markets, and Regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Observed in recent years increased volatility of agricultural commodity prices caused greater exposure of market participants on the price risk. The rapeseed price volatility in Poland, measured by coefficient of variation increased significantly in the years 2008–2010. In the article, We presented the possibilities of using price stabilizing market tools, including commodity derivatives in price risk management on farms in Poland. By means of simulation method presented the potential economic effects obtained in hedging transactions of rapeseed selling prices at the Matif Euronext and ICE Futures Canada markets. The conclusion is that the hedging of rapeseed prices in the futures contracts on foreign futures markets is little effective and difficult.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it