MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029223763 · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/43/2/025401

Direct-field electron acceleration with ultrafast radially polarized laser beams: scaling laws and optimization

2009· article· en· W2029223763 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsUltrashort pulseElectronAccelerationLaserCollimated lightAttosecondPulse durationOpticsPulse (music)Cathode rayAtomic physicsNuclear physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the past few years, there has been a growing interest for direct-field electron acceleration with ultra-intense and ultrafast radially polarized laser beams. This particular acceleration scheme offers the possibility of producing highly collimated mono-energetic relativistic attosecond electron pulses from an initial cloud of free electrons that could be produced by ionizing a nanoparticle. In this paper, we describe how electron energy scales with laser power and we explain how the beam waist size and the pulse duration can be optimized for maximal acceleration. The main conclusion of our work is that an electron can effectively reach the high-intensity optical cycles of this particular beam and be optimally accelerated without the necessity of being released by photoionization near the pulse peak.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it