Atrial cardiomyocyte tachycardia alters cardiac fibroblast function: A novel consideration in atrial remodeling☆
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation (AF) causes tachycardia-induced atrial electrical remodeling, contributing to the progressive nature of the arrhythmia. Ventricular dysfunction due to a rapid response to AF can cause structural remodeling, but whether AF itself directly promotes atrial fibrosis is controversial. This study investigated the hypothesis that rapid atrial cardiomyocyte activation produces factors that influence atrial fibroblast proliferation and secretory functions. METHODS: Cultured canine atrial fibroblasts were treated with medium from rapidly-paced atrial cardiomyocytes, non-paced cardiomyocytes and cardiomyocyte-pacing medium only, and analyzed by [(3)H]thymidine incorporation, Western blot and real-time RT-PCR. RESULTS: Rapidly-paced cardiomyocyte-conditioned medium reduced [(3)H]thymidine uptake compared to non-paced cardiomyocyte-conditioned medium and medium alone (approximately 85%, P<0.01). Rapidly-paced cardiomyocyte medium increased alpha SMA protein (approximately 55%, p<0.001), collagen-1 (approximately 85%, P<0.05) and fibronectin-1 (approximately 205%, P<0.05) mRNA expression vs. controls. The angiotensin-1 receptor blocker valsartan attenuated pacing-induced alpha SMA changes but did not affect fibroblast proliferation. Suppression of contraction with blebbistatin did not prevent tachypacing-induced changes in [(3)H]thymidine uptake or alpha SMA upregulation, pointing to a primary role of electrical over mechanical cardiomyocyte activity. Atrial tissue from 1-week atrial-tachypaced dogs with ventricular rate control similarly showed upregulation of alpha SMA protein (approximately 40%, P<0.05), collagen-1 (approximately 380%, P<0.01) and fibronectin-1 (approximately 430%, P<0.001) mRNA versus shams. CONCLUSIONS: Rapidly-paced cardiomyocytes release substances that profoundly alter cardiac fibroblast function, inducing an activated myofibroblast phenotype that is reflected by increased ECM-gene expression in vivo. These findings are consistent with recent observations that AF per se may cause ECM remodeling, and have potentially important consequences for understanding and preventing the mechanisms underlying AF progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".