MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029288320 · doi:10.1081/ss-100107771

LIQUID-LIQUID EXTRACTION AND SEPARATION OF RHODIUM(III) FROM OTHER PLATINUM GROUP METALS WITH CYANEX 925

2001· article· en· W2029288320 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ashok Mhaske, Purushottam Dhadke

Bibliographic record

VenueSeparation Science and Technology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryRhodiumPlatinum groupPlatinumExtraction (chemistry)Group (periodic table)Liquid–liquid extractionSeparation (statistics)ChromatographyInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Liquid-liquid extraction of platinum group metals Rh(III), Pt(IV), and Pd(II) was carried out from aqueous chloride media with Cyanex 925 in the absence and presence of tin (II) chloride. In the absence of tin (II) chloride, the order of extraction was found to be Pd > Pt > Rh. However, in the presence of tin (II) chloride, it changed to Pt > Rh and is negligible in the case of palladium. The extraction of rhodium was studied under the influence of variables such as hydrochloric acid, reagent, and tin (II) chloride concentrations; equilibration time; and effect of diverse ions. The separation of Rhodium (III) from Pt(IV) and Pd(II) was enabled because of differences in their extraction and stripping abilities when Cyanex 925 is used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeparation Science and TechnologySame topicExtraction and Separation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207