Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fullerenes with properly closed shells (having exactly half their adjacency eigenvalues strictly positive) are rare. All reported examples obey the isolated-pentagon rule (IPR), usually considered a necessary condition of overall stability, and fall into three series (leapfrogs, carbon cylinders and sporadic closed shells). It is shown here that there also exist fullerenes with properly closed shells that violate the IPR ('super-sporadic' fullerenes). All have negative LUMO eigenvalues of small magnitude. Exhaustive search finds four examples with 160 or fewer vertices: one isomer of C(120), two of C(156) and one of C(160). The first three contain single pentagon pairs and the fourth, a linear triple of fused pentagons. Larger examples can be found. A capping construction gives a series of properly closed shell fullerenes of C(3)/C(3v) symmetry, each with a single fully fused triple of pentagons and ≥632 vertices. Tubular extension of the C(120) example leads a series of C(1)/C(s) isomer pairs with ≥168 vertices, retaining the single pentagon adjacency and approaching isospectrality with increasing size. Both constructions are conjectured to lead to an infinite number of super-sporadic fullerenes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".