The safety and short‐term efficacy of a novel polyurethane meniscal scaffold for the treatment of segmental medial meniscus deficiency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Meniscal loss is associated with an increased risk of developing osteoarthritis. Tissue engineering solutions, which include the development of novel material scaffolds, are being utilised to aid the regeneration of meniscal tissue. The purpose of this study was to monitor the safety profile and the short-term efficacy of a novel polyurethane meniscal scaffold in the treatment of patients with painful knees following partial medial meniscectomy. METHODS: Ten consecutive patients with segmental tissue loss from the medial meniscus were treated with the arthroscopic implantation of an Actifit(®) (Orteq Sports Medicine) polyurethane meniscal scaffold. Patients were followed up at 2 and 6 weeks, then again at 6 and 12 months. Primary outcome measures included reporting of complications and patient-reported outcome scores (KOOS, KSS, UCLA Activity scale, VAS pain). Secondary outcome was MRI assessment at 6 and 12 months looking at scaffold morphology, integration and associated joint injury/inflammation. RESULTS: Eight male and 2 female patients were included in the study with a mean age of 29 (range 18-45). No complications were reported. All patients were happy with their surgery. At 6 months, a statistically significant improvement (P < 0.05) in all PROMS except the UCLA activity scale and VAS pain scale were noted. The improvement remained at 12 months. MRI analysis revealed the presence of scaffolds at 6 months, with evidence of some tissue integration in many improvements in scaffold morphology and ICRS classification of cartilage in the medial compartment were noted at 12 months. No synovitis was noted in the joint or adverse reactions in the other compartments. CONCLUSION: The new Actifit(®) polyurethane scaffold has been shown to be a safe, effective implant, for the treatment of patients with pain as a result of segmental medial meniscus loss at 1 year. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".