MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029369378 · doi:10.7202/1013174ar

Défis associés à l’offre de services de santé et de services sociaux en français au Manitoba : perceptions des professionnels

2012· article· fr· W2029369378 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Danielle de Moissac, Janelle de Rocquigny, Florette Giasson, Cindy-Lynne Tremblay, Natalie Aubin, Marc Charron, Gratien Allaire

Bibliographic record

VenueReflets Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaire · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityFrancophone University AssociationUniversité de Saint-Boniface
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrenchPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les services de santé et les services sociaux en français ne sont accessibles qu’auprès d’un quart de la population francophone au Manitoba (de Moissac, 2011). Une pénurie de professionnels pouvant offrir des services en français est perçue comme un obstacle important pour les usagers qui recherchent ces services et pour les professionnels qui voudraient assurer un suivi en français pour leurs clients. Une hésitation à s’identifier comme francophone et un manque de connaissance des ressources disponibles en français contribuent-ils à cette perception de pénurie? Cet article traite des défis entourant l’offre de services de santé et de services sociaux en français au Manitoba et suggère des pistes de solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.731

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.400 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReflets Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaireSame topicInterpreting and Communication in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207