MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029372581 · doi:10.1080/08927020412331298667

Structure and Electronic Properties of Metal Di-(4-thiophenyl)-porphyrin

2004· article· en· W2029372581 on OpenAlexaff
Y. Kikuchi, Rodion V. Belosludov, H. Baba, Amir A. Farajian, Hiroshi Mizuseki, Yoshiyuki Kawazoe

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Simulation · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
FundersInstitute for Materials Research, Tohoku University
KeywordsPorphyrinDihedral angleMolecular orbitalMetalMoleculeAtomic orbitalChemistryCrystallographyElectronic structureComputational chemistryMaterials sciencePhotochemistryElectronPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The geometry and electronic structures of metal 5, 15-di-(4-thiophenyl)-porphyrin (MDTP) have been investigated using first-principles calculations. Several metal atoms, including Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu and Zn, have been selected. It has been found that the dihedral angle between porphyrin and thiophenyl planes is close to the perpendicular, which means that the π conjugation in whole MDTP molecules is broken. The most stable spin configurations of Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and NiDTPs are 5/2, 1, 1/2 and 0, respectively. Analysis of metal 3d-orbital splitting in Zn and NiDTP have shown that in the case of NiDTP, the out-of-plane interaction between metal 3d-orbitals and π orbital of porphyrin is larger than that in the case of ZnDTP. The results suggest that the Ni metal will enhance the conductance of DTP because transport properties in molecular systems have strong relations to the molecular π orbital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular SimulationSame topicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine ChemistryFrench-language works237,207