Hiding cusps in cores: kinematics of disc galaxies in triaxial dark matter haloes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study the kinematics of gaseous discs in triaxial dark matter haloes using the closed-loop orbit solutions in non-axisymmetric potentials. The orbits are in general non-circular and, for a given triaxiality, their ellipticity depends on the ratio of escape to circular velocities, V2esc/V2c. This ratio increases steeply towards the centre for cold dark matter (CDM) halo density profiles, implying that even minor deviations from spherical symmetry may induce large deviations from circular orbits in the velocity field of a gaseous disc, especially near the centre. This result suggests that caution should be exercised when interpreting constraints on the presence of density cusps in the dark halo derived from the innermost velocity profile. Simulated long-slit rotation curves vary greatly in shape, depending primarily on the viewing angle of the disc and on its orientation relative to the principal axes of the potential. ‘Solid-body’ rotation curves – typically interpreted as a signature of a constant density core in the dark matter distribution – are often obtained when the slit samples velocities near the major axis of the closed-loop orbits. Triaxial potentials imprint specific symmetries in 2D velocity fields, generally inducing ‘twists’ in the isovelocity contours and antisymmetric patterns in opposite quadrants. We suggest that triaxial haloes may be responsible for the variety of shapes of long-slit rotation curves of low surface brightness (LSB) galaxies, as well as for the complex central kinematics of LSBs, which are sometimes ascribed to the presence of ‘radial motions’ in the gas. We argue that LSB rotation curves might be reconciled with the structure of CDM haloes once the effects of halo triaxiality on the dynamics of gaseous discs are properly taken into account.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".