MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029409370 · doi:10.4296/cwrj3404427

Can Analysis of Historic Lagg Forms Be of Use in the Restoration of Highly Altered Raised Bogs? Examples from Burns Bog, British Columbia

2009· article· en· W2029409370 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sarah A. Howie, Paul H. Whitfield, Richard J. Hebda, Roslyn Dakin, John K. Jeglum

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBogPeatWetlandVegetation (pathology)Natural (archaeology)Environmental scienceEcologyEcosystemHydrology (agriculture)GeologyGeographyBiologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural bogs are generally surrounded by a zone of hydrologic, hydrochemical, and ecological gradients called a lagg. In laggs, large changes over short lateral distances result in distinctive ecological gradients and vegetation patterns. Part of the restoration planning challenge for Burns Bog involves recreating such water and chemistry gradients to establish and maintain conditions for appropriate plant and animal communities that reflect natural transitions from nutrient-poor bog to adjacent mineral-soil-influenced wetlands. We present a conceptual model inferred from historic air photos and vegetation maps from the margins of Burns Bog and theorize how particular vegetation represents the hydrological and hydrochemical gradients of the past that existed in transition to surrounding landscapes. Understanding lagg ecosystems and how they function is important not only to restoring the ecological integrity of Burns Bog, but also to developing a conceptual model useful for predicting and interpreting these gradients in other peatlands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriquesSame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207