MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029437654 · doi:10.1109/icif.2007.4407996

Unified sensor management using CPHD filters

2007· article· en· W2029437654 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFilter (signal processing)Moment (physics)Probability density functionComputer scienceDistribution (mathematics)Posterior probabilityProbability distributionMathematicsStatisticsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionPhysicsMathematical analysisBayesian probability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The PHD filter propagates a multitarget statistical first moment, the probability hypothesis density (PHD), in place of the full multitarget posterior distribution. It has been the basis of a systematic approach to multisensor, multitarget sensor management based on the posterior expected number of targets (PENT) objective function. The PHD filter has since been generalized to the cardinalized PHD (CPHD) filter, which propagates not only the PHD but also the full probability distribution on target number. The CPHD filter provides more accurate estimates of target number and target states. This paper shows how PENT-based objective functions can be naturally extended for use with the CPHD filter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it