Osteoinductivity of partially purified bovine, ostrich and emu bone morphogenetic proteins <i>in vitro</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to observe the osteogenic activity of native bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) obtained from different species including bovine, ostrich and emu sources in order to compare mammalian and avian BMPs. Rat mesenchymal progenitor marrow stromal cells and pre-osteoblastic C2C12 cell cultures, were exposed to the native BMPs and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and creatine kinase (CK) levels were determined by assay. The results showed that the ALP activity in C2C12 cultures was elevated by bovine BMP by 2- to 10-fold (p < 0.05-0.001) from day 3 during 14 days. There were no significant differences in avian BMP related elevations of ALP activity except with ostrich BMPs at day 14 (p < 0.05). However, exposure of MSCs cultures to BMPs derived from bovine, ostrich or emu sources resulted in elevated ALP from day 3 (p < 0.05). Bovine BMP resulted in more ALP elevation than with either of the avian BMPs. All of BMPs elevated Creatine kinase (CK) activity from day 1 and climbed until peaking at day 7. Compared with control cultures, CK was elevated more with exposure to emu BMP and was more elevated with greater statistical significance than with bovine and ostrich BMP before day 5. These higher levels remained until day 14 (p < 0.05). The results of this study suggest that both bovine and avian BMPs are able to stimulate osteogenesis in mature osteoblasts in vitro. The strongest synergistic effect on osteogenesis was detected in cells stimulated with bovine BMP. Avian BMPs had lower effects on ALP and CK activity, emu BMP being more effective than ostrich BMP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".