Lipid Phase Dependence of DNA−Cationic Phospholipid Bilayer Interactions Examined Using Atomic Force Microscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Magnetic AC mode atomic force microscopy was used to study DNA adsorption onto supported cationic phospholipid (CL) bilayers in the fluid (L α ) and gel (L β ) phases. A L α phase CL bilayer was used as a model system to study DNA−CL complex formation at the single molecule level. Pure and mixed bilayers of dioleoyltrimethylammonium propane (DOTAP), dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE), dioleoylphosphatidylcholine (DOPC), and dipalmitoyltrimethylammonium propane (DPTAP) were investigated. The adsorption of small oligodeoxynucleotide DNA (14 base pairs) and large (1000−3000 base pairs) was examined and revealed that the behavior of the DNA−CL complex depends on the length and density of DNA. Once adsorbed to the bilayer, large DNA induced changes in the bilayer coverage of the mica support, while short DNA did not destabilize the bilayer. There was a strong dependence of the bilayer destabilization on the type of neutral helper lipid mixed with the cationic lipid, with DOTAP/DOPE being much less stable to DNA adsorption than DOTAP/DOPC. The characteristics of pure and mixed DOTAP, DOPE, and DOPC supported phospholipid bilayers were investigated to understand the stability changes induced by DNA. Images of the DNA-free phospholipid bilayer revealed the dependence of supported planar bilayer structure and stability on the chemical nature of the headgroup and on the phase of the bilayer. Finally, it was illuminating to image DNA on DPTAP bilayers as a function of temperature. When the system was examined above the L α −L β phase transition, images similar to those recorded for DNA−DOTAP (L α ) and DNA−DOTAP/DOPC (L α ) were observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".