Molecular cloning and characterization of a cDNA encoding a novel cuticle protein from the Chinese oak Silkmoth,<i>Antheraea pernyi</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In our research to identify gene involved in the cuticle protein, we cloned a novel cuticle protein gene, ApCP13, from the Chinese oak silkmoth, Antheraea pernyi, larvae cDNA library. The ApCP13 gene encodes a 120 amino acid polypeptide with a predicted molecular mass of 13 kDa and a pI of 4.01, and is intron-less gene. The ApCP13 contained a type-specific consensus sequence identifiable in other insect cuticle proteins and the deduced amino acid sequence of the ApCP13 cDNA is most homologous to another wild silkmoth, A. yamamai CP12 (86% protein sequence identity), followed by Bombyx mori LCP18 (35% protein sequence identity). Northern blot analysis revealed that the ApCP13 showed the epidermis-specific expression. This is the first report of cuticle protein gene in the wild silkmoth, A. pernyi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".