MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Extended Analysis of Doubly Ionized Iodine Spectrum: I III

2004· article· en· W2029536270 on OpenAlexafffund
A. Tauheed, Y N Joshi, Anjum Naz

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica Scripta · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsIonizationPhysicsZeeman effectAtomic physicsSpectrum (functional analysis)Spectral lineAnalytical Chemistry (journal)IonChemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The spectrum of iodine was recorded in the 300–1250 Å on 3 m and 6.65 m normal incidence spectrographs at the Antigonish laboratory and Zeeman Laboratory using a triggered spark and sliding spark sources. The earlier analysis of the 5s 2 5p 3 , 5s 2 5p 2 (5d + 6s) and 5s5p 4 configurations has been confirmed, the level 5s 2 5p 2 5d 2 S 1/2 has been found and levels of four new even parity configurations viz. 5s 2 5p 2 n s ( n = 7,8) and 5s 2 5p 2 n d ( n = 6,7) with J ≤ 7/12, have been established. One hundred and ninety (190) new lines have been classified in I III spectrum and 69 new levels have been established. Hartree–Fock (HF) and least-squares-fitted (LSF) calculations support the interpretation presented in this report. Using 5s 2 5p 2 n s ( n = 6,7,8) and 5s 2 5p 2 n d ( n = 5,6,7) series Ionization Potential has been calculated as 238500 ± 200 cm -1 (29.56 ± 0.02 eV) for I IV 5s 2 5p 2 3 P 0 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysica ScriptaSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207