MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029541009 · doi:10.1149/1.1402983

ZnGa[sub 2]O[sub 4]:Mn phosphors for Thin-Film Electroluminescent Displays Exhibiting Improved Brightness

2001· article· en· W2029541009 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Flynn, Adrian H. Kitai

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicZnO doping and properties
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsElectroluminescencePhotoluminescenceAnnealing (glass)Materials scienceThin filmPhosphorBrightnessSputteringAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Sputter depositionOptoelectronicsOpticsMetallurgyComposite materialChemistryNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thin films of films have been deposited by radio frequency magnetron sputtering in order to study the effects of annealing temperatures less than 1000°C on the thin-film electroluminescent properties. Energy-dispersive X-ray compositional analysis showed a loss of zinc during sputtering, with the film composition being All films showed strong (111) and (222) X-ray reflections relative to the power standard. As the annealing temperature was raised, the texture rotated toward that of the powder material. The as-deposited films showed no photoluminescence; however, once annealed at a single emission band at 504 nm was observed. Emission wavelength was independent of annealing temperature. The electroluminescent brightness of the devices peaked at an annealing temperature of 900°C. Peak brightness and efficiency were 350 and 0.55 lm/W at 60 Hz, and 1500 and 0.30 lm/W at 600 Hz. These high brightness values have been attributed to the roughness of the substrates. © 2001 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicZnO doping and propertiesFrench-language works237,207