MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029541009 · doi:10.1149/1.1402983

ZnGa[sub 2]O[sub 4]:Mn phosphors for Thin-Film Electroluminescent Displays Exhibiting Improved Brightness

2001· article· en· W2029541009 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicZnO doping and properties
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsElectroluminescencePhotoluminescenceAnnealing (glass)Materials scienceThin filmPhosphorBrightnessSputteringAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Sputter depositionOptoelectronicsOpticsMetallurgyComposite materialChemistryNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thin films of films have been deposited by radio frequency magnetron sputtering in order to study the effects of annealing temperatures less than 1000°C on the thin-film electroluminescent properties. Energy-dispersive X-ray compositional analysis showed a loss of zinc during sputtering, with the film composition being All films showed strong (111) and (222) X-ray reflections relative to the power standard. As the annealing temperature was raised, the texture rotated toward that of the powder material. The as-deposited films showed no photoluminescence; however, once annealed at a single emission band at 504 nm was observed. Emission wavelength was independent of annealing temperature. The electroluminescent brightness of the devices peaked at an annealing temperature of 900°C. Peak brightness and efficiency were 350 and 0.55 lm/W at 60 Hz, and 1500 and 0.30 lm/W at 600 Hz. These high brightness values have been attributed to the roughness of the substrates. © 2001 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it