MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029548375 · doi:10.1063/1.3581025

Broadband gigahertz dynamics of relaxor ferroelectric Pb(Sc1/2Nb1/2)O3-<i>x</i>PbTiO3 single crystal probed by Brillouin scattering

2011· article· en· W2029548375 on OpenAlexafffund
Seiji Kojima, Shinya Tsukada, Y. Hidaka, Alexei A. Bokov, Zuo‐Guang Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchUniversity of TsukubaSimon Fraser UniversityMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsCurie temperatureBrillouin zoneMaterials scienceFerroelectricityBrillouin scatteringSoft modesScatteringPhase transitionPhase boundaryRelaxation (psychology)Phase (matter)DielectricOpticsPhysicsFerromagnetism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The broadband gigahertz dynamics of a relaxor ferroelectric crystal 0.70Pb(Sc1/2Nb1/2)O3-0.30PbTiO3 with a composition close to the starting point of the morphotropic phase boundary is studied by Brillouin scattering. The significant anomaly of the longitudinal acoustic (LA) mode is observed in the vicinity of the Curie temperature, TC = 500 K. Upon cooling, it starts below the Burns temperature, TB = 670 K, due to the interaction between the LA mode and dynamic polar nanoregions (PNRs). The broad central peak (CP) clearly appears below TB, and its intensity becomes a maximum at TC. The relaxation time, τCP, determined from the CP width, shows the typical critical slowing down of the order-disorder phase transition in the vicinity of TC. The size of a dynamic PNR significantly increases below the intermediate temperature, T* = 562 K.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207