MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029621972 · doi:10.2118/89369-ms

Influence of Horizontal Section Sinuosity and Lateral Accuracy on Heavy Oil Cold Production from Close-Spaced Senlac/Winter Saskatchewan Wells

2004· article· en· W2029621972 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)Encana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfillSinuosityDrillingGeologyDirectional drillingCompletion (oil and gas wells)Water wellChannel (broadcasting)Well drillingDrainageEnvironmental geologyInjection wellGeotechnical engineeringPetroleum engineeringHydrology (agriculture)EngineeringHydrogeologyGeomorphologyGroundwater

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Horizontal well drilling for heavy oil cold production in Western Canada was initiated in 1988, and has matured to the extent that over 550 horizontal wells have been drilled into the Cummings/Dina channel trend between Senlac and Winter, Saskatchewan. A significant fraction of the more recent wells have been drilled as infills to enhance reservoir drainage. Reviews of the performance of these wells suggest drilling accuracy in all three dimensions within the horizontal section strongly affects the performance of original wells and the ability to optimize placement of infill horizontal wells between the original wells. Horizontal trajectory control has improved significantly in the last 10 years, the latest improvement being 'inclination at the bit.' Selected wells were analyzed to determine the key factors between horizontal section sinuosity and both production rate and ultimate recovery, and the changes in the effect of these key factors over the last 10 years. Incentive and methodology for development of current flatter wells is discussed, and predictions of improved production are given. Initial spacing in many areas was nominally 75 meters, and several areas are being infill drilled to 37.5 meter spacing to increase reservoir drainage. The heels of the infill wells are placed between the toes of the original wells to avoid expected greater oil depletion and water coning at the heels of the original wells. Several recent infill wells encountered lost circulation and/or magnetic interference from offsetting original wells, indicating the locations of the original wells obtained from MWD data were not accurate. For subsequent infill wells gyros were run in the original wells, and the gyro-based original well locations disagreed with the MWD-based locations. This prompted an examination of existing drilling, MWD, gyro, and magnetic North positioning data and technology. This paper discusses the theoretical and practical aspects of drilling flatter horizontal wells, establishing the locations of existing horizontal wells, and optimum placement of infill horizontal wells between the existing wells in the Senlac/Winter, Saskatchewan pools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it