MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029624235 · doi:10.1353/hcy.2014.0048

Making Room(s) for Teenagers: Space and Place at Early Postwar Maternity Homes in Ontario and British Columbia

2014· article· en· W2029624235 on OpenAlex
Sharon Wall

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the history of childhood and youth/˜The œjournal of the history of childhood and youth · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemiseSeclusionGender studiesTeenage pregnancySpace (punctuation)PreferenceSociologyPsychologyDemographyPolitical sciencePopulationPsychiatryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article analyzes maternity homes in post-WWII Ontario and British Columbia in terms of age, space, and place. The majority of residents during this period were teenage girls, a shift that reflected the growing number of unmarried pregnancies among teens, but also the preference of homes themselves. Maternity homes tried to adapt to their new clientele, but their goal of providing a real “home away from home” for teenage girls was difficult to achieve. Finally, during this time from 1945-1960, homes which had long promised “seclusion” became less isolationist, a trend which reflected changing thinking about the treatment of unmarried motherhood. The same trend would ultimately bring about the demise of the maternity home as a solution to the challenges of unmarried pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.779

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it