MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029624235 · doi:10.1353/hcy.2014.0048

Making Room(s) for Teenagers: Space and Place at Early Postwar Maternity Homes in Ontario and British Columbia

2014· article· en· W2029624235 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sharon Wall

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the history of childhood and youth/˜The œjournal of the history of childhood and youth · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemiseSeclusionGender studiesTeenage pregnancySpace (punctuation)PreferenceSociologyPsychologyDemographyPolitical sciencePopulationPsychiatryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article analyzes maternity homes in post-WWII Ontario and British Columbia in terms of age, space, and place. The majority of residents during this period were teenage girls, a shift that reflected the growing number of unmarried pregnancies among teens, but also the preference of homes themselves. Maternity homes tried to adapt to their new clientele, but their goal of providing a real “home away from home” for teenage girls was difficult to achieve. Finally, during this time from 1945-1960, homes which had long promised “seclusion” became less isolationist, a trend which reflected changing thinking about the treatment of unmarried motherhood. The same trend would ultimately bring about the demise of the maternity home as a solution to the challenges of unmarried pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0160.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the history of childhood and youth/˜The œjournal of the history of childhood and youthSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207